Schlüsselpublikationen:
						
						
						
		Technologische Innovationen
		
		
			
			Hoffmann, M.P., et al. (2016). Assessing the Potential for Zone-Specific Management of Cereals in Low-Rainfall South-Eastern Australia: Combining On-Farm Results and Simulation Analysis 
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science  203, 14–28.
DOI:10.1111/jac.12159
Kassie, B.T., Van Ittersum, M.K., Hengsdijk, H., Asseng, S., Wolf, J. & Rötter, R.P. (2014). Climate-induced yield variability and yield gaps of maize (Zea mays L.) in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia 
Field Crops Research 160, 41-53.
DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.010
			 
		 
		Klimabedingte Risiken, Klimaanpassungs- und Klimaschutzstrategien
		
		
			
Bracho-Mujica, G., et al. (2024). Effects of Changes in Climatic Means and Variability on Future Wheat and Maize Yields and the Role of Adaptive Agro-Technologies in Reducing Negative Impacts. 
 Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Volume 346,2024,109887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109887
Appiah, M., et al. (2023). Projected impacts of sowing date and cultivar choice on the timing of heat and drought stress 
in spring barley grown along a European transect.
Field Crops Research 291, 108768.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108768
Asseng, S., et al. (2015). Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production 
Nature Climate Change 5, 143-147. 
 
DOI:10.1038/nclimate2470
Hoffmann, M.P., et al. (2018). Exploring adaptations of groundnut cropping to prevailing climate variability and extremes in Limpopo Province, South Africa 
Field Crops Research 219, 1-13.  
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.019
Rötter, R.P., et al. (2018). Linking modelling and experimentation to better capture crop impacts of agroclimatic extremes - A review 
Field Crops Research 221, 142–156. 
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.023 
Kahiluoto, H., et al. (2014). Cultivating resilience by empirically revealing response diversity 
Global Environmental Change 25, 186-193. 
DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.002 
Rötter, R.P., et al. (2015). Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars 
Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 3463-3476.  
DOI:10.1093/jxb/erv098 
			 
		 
		Nutzung und Management von genetischer Diversität
		
		
			
                 Rötter, R.P., Tao, F., Höhn, J.G., Palosuo, T. (2015) Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars
 Journal of Experimental Botany 66 (12), 3463-3476 
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv098erv098
Tao, F., Rötter, R.P., Palosuo, T., et al. (2016) Designing future barley ideotypes using a crop model ensemble 
European Journal of Agronomy  82(A), 144-162
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.012
			 
 
		Modellentwicklung und -verbesserung
		
		
			
Liu, K. et al., (2023).Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates. 
Nat Commun 14, 765
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36129-4  
de Wit, A., et al. (2015). WOFOST developer's response to article by Stella et al. 
Environmental Modelling & Software 59, 44-58. 
 
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.005
Hoffmann, M.P., et al. (2014). Simulating potential growth and yield in oil palm with PALMSIM: Model description, evaluation and application 
Agricultural Systems 131, 1-10. 
 
DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.07.006 
Rötter, R.P., et al. (2011). Crop–climate models need an overhaul 
Nature Climate Change 1, 175-177. 
 
DOI:10.1038/nclimate1152 
Rötter, R.P., et al. (2014). Robust uncertainty 
Nature Climate Change 4, 251-252. 
 
DOI:10.1038/nclimate2181
Wallach, D., et al. (2016). Estimating model prediction error: Should you treat predictions as fixed or random? 
Environmental Modelling & Software  84, 529-539. 
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.010			 
		 
		Integrierte Analyse von landwirtschaftlichen Systemen und Landnutzung
		
		
			
                 Ewert, F., et al. (2015). Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change 
Environmental Modelling & Software 72, 287-303.  
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.003
Liu, X., et al. (2016). Dynamic economic modelling of crop rotations with farm management practices under future pest pressure 
Agricultural Systems 144, 65-76.  
DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.003